Translation of Legislation: Effect Analysis of Michigan Opioid Law on Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: To combat almost 450,000 Americans dying of opioid overdose between 1999 and 2018, the Michigan Opioid Laws were implemented on July 1, 2018, to reduce overprescription of opioids. This retrospective study evaluated the effect of this legislation on prescribing patterns after thoracic operations at an academic, tertiary care center. METHOD: Charts of 776 patients undergoing lobectomy, paraesophageal hiatal hernia repair, Nissen fundoplication, or esophagectomy between July 1, 2017, and July 1, 2019, were reviewed. Populations were identified before and after the July 1, 2018 implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws. Procedure type, analgesic type, total pills, morphine equivalents, and refills and their pill number were independent variables. Patients using opioids for >30 days before operations were excluded. RESULTS: Overall, 629 patients were included in the analysis (324 pre-legislation patients, 305 post-legislation patients). The average number of opioids prescribed to patients at discharge before the legislation was 28.0 pills vs 21.4 pills after (P < .01). Before implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws, 14.5% of patients received refills, whereas only 5.9% received refills after implementation, reducing the average number of refills per patient from 0.19 to 0.07 (P < .001). Average morphine equivalents and percentage of patients receiving opioids showed no statistical difference. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of the Michigan Opioid Laws correlated with a change in clinical practice, potentially by reducing the number of pills and refills prescribed per patient, and did not deter providers from prescribing opioids acutely. This suggests that the Michigan Opioid Laws allow prescribing freedom while giving legislative structure encouraging time-conscious tapering. The Michigan Opioid Laws may serve as a model for other states to emulate.

A systems framework depicting how complex neighborhood dynamics and contextual factors could impact the effectiveness of an alcohol outlet zoning policy.

An updated zoning policy eliminating all alcohol outlets (liquor stores) in residential districts was implemented to reduce high rates of violent crime in Baltimore City. Diverse stakeholders were engaged in group model building (GMB) activities to develop causal loop diagrams (CLDs) that elucidate the impact of the new zoning policy on crime, and more broadly, the potentially unintended social and environmental consequences of the policy. Three distinct groups, community advocates, city officials/academics, and community residents, participated in three separate GMB sessions. Three CLDs, one from each stakeholder group, were created to depict the possible outcomes of the zoning policy. Our findings offer insight into potential unintended consequences of removing liquor stores from residential areas that may undermine the policy. Community members described the need for additional supports related to mental health and substance use, opportunities for investment in the community, access to other goods and services, and community-police relations to ensure the policy achieved its intended goal of reducing violent crime. Our findings highlight the importance of timely engagement of local stakeholders to understand how complex neighborhood dynamics and contextual factors could impact the effectiveness of a zoning policy change.

Using Land Policy to Improve Population Health.

We examine whether zoning can increase health equity and population health by assessing a new zoning ordinance in the City of Baltimore that forced 76 liquor stores in residential areas to relocate, close, or convert to an approved use. To do so, we undertake a baseline assessment of neighborhoods with affected liquor stores, and predict the potential impact of the zoning change by estimating the impact of previous closures and openings of liquor stores on neighborhood crime in Baltimore using a spatial Poisson random trend fixed effects model. We find that affected stores are concentrated in high poverty, majority black neighborhoods with high vacancy rates, and that liquor store closings are associated with a statistically significant reduction in violent crime on the block group in question with no negative spillover affects onto the nearby block groups.

Bridging the Housing and Health Policy Divide: Lessons in Community Development from Memphis and Baltimore.

Governments and nonprofits routinely partner to launch place-based initiatives in distressed neighborhoods with the goal of stabilizing real estate markets, reclaiming vacant properties, abating public nuisances, and reducing crime. Public health impacts and outcomes are rarely the major policy drivers in the design and implementation of these neighborhood scale initiatives. In this article, we examine recent Health Impact Assessments in Baltimore, Maryland and Memphis, Tennessee to show how public health concepts, principles, and practices can be infused into existing and new programs and policies, and how public health programs can help to improve population health by addressing the upstream social determinants of health. We provide a portfolio of ideas and practices to bridge this classic divide of housing and health policy.